Experience Apple on store

A lady with problems to pass an Apple Store, a customer who thought that Siri would be the height of Data (Star Trek), Samsung and the concept of “the thinnest” conspiracy of the Mafia and the FBI, or anger one of the most famous astronomers of the world when you touch your name. Everyone has something in common, and star in our collection is that of the seven most stupid and ridiculous claims against the block:

The grandmother who came into an Apple Store. Paswall Evelyn, 83 years old, walked to the nearest Apple Store with the intention of returning an iPhone. Unfortunately failed, giving face to face with the glass facade. This unfortunate incident is not fun, but demand that the lawyer filed against Apple Pawall asking themselves a million dollars. “Apple wants to be sophisticated and modern and uses an architecture that transmits that to the geeks, but otherwise , you should keep in mind the danger that this high-tech modern architecture is to some people. “

The average virtual assistant. Frank M. Fazio was impressed with the announcement of Siri, the wizard voice of the iPhone 4S, and immediately launched by one. However, soon reached the bitter conclusion that the ads were “false and misleading”, deciding to file a class action. “Siri, or do not understand what you ask, or, after a long wait, responds with a wrong answer (…) The best is a work in progress. ” Nobody explained that a beta is just that, a work in progress?

The thinnest of all. Apple won the right to call the iPhone 4 “the thinnest smartphone in the world” on September 14, 2011 when the Anvertising UK Standards Authority dismissed a lawsuit from Samsung. The Korean automaker claimed in claim half the Galaxy S II 8.71 mm, being definitely thinner than the Apple phone with 9.3 mm. The company Apple was forced to pull out the tape measure and show that although the Samsung phone had these dimensions in its thinnest part, the bulging upper middle 9.91 mm. The ASA agreed that consumers are concerned about the overall size of a device, not only by the thinnest part of this.

The Mafia, the FBI, Apple and mind control. Gregory McKenna, a resident of Beverly Hills, introduced in June 2009 one of the more bizarre claims of history when he accused Apple and nine other companies and organizations among which was FBI himself, the police department of San Luis, and his garage, of conspiring with the Mafia for two iPods incluyesen after sync clear threats like “I’ll kill you.” Apparently McKenna was convinced that the Mafia wanted to intimidate him return to work at a modeling agency controlled by them.

Apple was in litigation with Motorola to register an important part of success. The federal appeals court in the U.S. Chicago has ruled that Apple has with the “heuristics touchscreen patent (949)” Property Rights in touch screen applications. Experts believe the trend-setting decision, because the patent could reach almost all tablets and smartphones with touch screen.

Already since the year 2010, arguing Apple and Motorola for alleged patent violations. Well, Apple in the lawsuit with Motorola to register an important part of success. The judge Richard Posner on the federal appeals court in Chicago in the U.S. came to the conclusion that Apple has with the “heuristics touchscreen patent (949)” Property Rights in touch screen applications. It is the third time that Apple and Motorola on this issue before the court were – in the previous negotiations Posner also decided to Apple.

The “heuristics touchscreen patent (949)” describes a technique which the user inputs translated into control commands. The special thing here is the recognition of gestures that are not clear. The smartphone or tablet is thus able to understand its user’s commands, even when performing a gesture could be detected only approximate. The technique is therefore just the fact that people are characterized, for example, no absolutely precise line on the touch screen. Experts believe the trend-setting decision, because the patent could reach almost all tablets and smartphones with touch screen.

Apple could be the argument not only in the trials of Motorola, but also against other manufacturers or even the Google Android operating system use. One end of the dispute between Apple and Motorola, however, is still not in sight. A few weeks ago, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) in another case for Motorola decided and the violation of three patents that Apple are rejected.